It is ironic that generally the less capital novice investors have the more risk they take. They focus on higher risk trading instruments or higher risk trades seeking the large quick returns. Besides the additional volatility risk, they then magnify that risk by allocating too much capital to these high risk trades and in many cases leverage. Too much is a relative term. It is this very mindset that leads to most novice investors losing in the market. In fact, lack of capital is one of the biggest reasons why most novice investors are “taken out” by the market.
With more capital, more opportunities can be traded which, in turn, through compounding, can increase absolute returns if the active investor knows how to manage the risks, has the discipline to follow the rules and allocates capital according to the risks being taken. More capital will also allow the active investor to sustain a number of consecutive losses (provided they can handle the loss trades psychologically).
So how much is more?
I recommend that anyone trading in a medium term time frame (average hold period of around 8 weeks) should start with a minimum starting capital of A$50,000 but preferably A$80,000.
The main reason for A$50,000 being the minimum is the minimum brokerage that is paid to transact in the market. In Australia, assume a minimum brokerage of $30 or 0.15%, which ever is the greater, a trade size of A$2,000 would incur brokerage of 1.5% of the position ($30 ÷ A$2,000).
If a trading system averages 4% movement per trade (excl. brokerage) then the buy and sell transactions would use up 3% leaving just ¼ of the gross profit for the trader with the broker getting ¾ of the gross profit. You can change brokers to reduce your brokerage but there is a limit to how low you can reduce your brokerage rates. The answer is to increase your trade size which means you need to increase your trading bank.
As a rule of thumb, ensure that your brokerage doesn’t exceed 0.35% per transaction, on average across your various position sizes, or 0.7% per trade (i.e. both buy and sell).
The general rule should be the less amount of capital you have, the more passive your strategy should be. The more capital you have the more active you can be (if you choose).
An approximate upper limit on medium-term trading capital would be around A$800,000 to A$1,000,000 per portfolio in the Australian market due to liquidity reasons. Basically, with larger amounts of capital, it is suggested that:
Otherwise the only limit on capital that can be used for medium-term active investment is imposed by the liquidity of and the number of stocks on the exchange being traded.
There is, however, a school of thought that if you trade a system that over time continues to provide excellent returns, then you should commit as much capital to that system as you can possibly lay your hands on, market liquidity permitting!
Assuming you are refering to non leveraged trading.
What are you rules for much capital is required for SP3CFD system per say?
I’m happy to reply on behalf of Gary.
You’re right. The article relates to a capital base for trading equities or stocks.
Those trading with leverage can begin medium term investment with a smaller amount of capital. We suggest a minimum starting amount of $25,000 for SPA3CFD.
Someone who did start with a portfolio value of this size would be leveraging up the equity ($25,000) to around $80,000 in a SPA3 low risk market.
SPA3CFD investors have clear and objective rules around when they trade leverage (CFD’s) and when to only trade stocks. This is handled by the risk and portfolio management tools.
You can read more about SPA3CFD at the following link http://www.sharewealthsystems.com/au/performance
I trade through an online broker ( a bank) and my trades are all $19.95 ,,,my portfolio is $80,000.00 , my risk allocation is per the default SPA3 , I believe that this is the optimum system for me in this circumstance ,,could you comment
Response to Comment by Adrian:
The lower the brokerage the better. $19.95 for all transactions is amongst the lowest brokerage around so you are just fine with this level of brokerage.
As a rule, medium term active investment strategies should ensure that their brokerage rate is < 0.35% pre transaction (hence 0.7% for the round trip per trade). As portfolio capital capital gets smaller it puts pressure on reducing the brokerage paid.
One last comment, when a SPA3 High Risk Market is signalled and positions sizes are halved ensure that you are not paying too high a brokerage rate for SPA3 High Risk trades.
What are your recommendations for the JSE? Brokerage is in the region of 0.5% (minimum R50)/trade, plus VAT and statutory taxes (Securities Transfer Tax @ 0.25% on purchases, Investor Protection Levy @ 0.0002% and Strate @ R10.92).
Response to Comment by Gary:
See my comment above regarding 0.35% per transaction in Australia. I know that the brokerage rates are relatively higher in South Africa which means this puts pressure on the minimum capital that should be used for medium term active investment.
In South Africa the Average Return per Trade in research is slightly higher than in Australia. The public portfiolios also bear this out over nearly 7 years of trading. This means that SPA3 trading on the JSE, or any active investment with an edge, can withstand slightly higher brokerage rates than in Australia (the JSE is a more volitle market than the ASX).
That said, it would be prudent to ensure that the round trip (buy and sell) should try to be kept to 1% for the JSE but obviously the lower the better.